Physical Therapy Korea
pISSN 1225-8962 eISSN 2287-982X

Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, AUC value and Youden index according to cutoff point of various fall risk assessment tools by each study

Study Tool Cutoff (score) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) AUC Youden index
Kim et al. [30] MFS 50 78.9 55.8 30.8 91.4 0.761
JHFRAT 12 69.0 60.0 30.1 88.6 0.708
BMFRA 11 76.1 58.3 31.8 90.9 0.715
Kim et al. [31] MFS 40 78.1 82.2 0.837
HFRM II 3 81.3 61.5 0.745
STRATIFY 2 84.4 73.5 0.828
Baek et al. [32] MFS 51 72.0 91.0 63.0 94.0 0.770 0.630
Kang and Song [33] MFS 45 86.7 60.8 68.9 82.0 0.806
JHFRAT 11 62.5 63.3 63.0 62.8 0.656
BMFRA 10 75.0 58.3 64.3 70.0 0.695
Yoo et al. [34] MFS 40 78.1 82.2 12.4 99.1 0.802 0.603
Fall risk score 6 84.4 86.0 16.4 99.4 0.852 0.704
HFRM II 3 81.3 61.5 6.4 99.0 0.714 0.428
STRATIFY 2 84.4 73.5 9.3 99.3 0.790 0.579
Cho et al. [35] MFS 45 59.3 65.0 36.1 82.7 0.641 0.240
JHFRAT 13 29.1 89.7 48.5 79.2 0.708 0.190
HFRM II 5 57.3 78.0 46.5 84.6 0.742 0.350
Choi et al. [36] MFS 50 61.8 76.8 13.3 97.5 0.728
JHFRAT 9 82.4 55.3 9.2 98.3 0.698
FAS-K 4 85.3 49.4 8.5 98.4 0.757
Lee et al. [37] MFS 32.5 78.8 37.9 0.613 0.167
TUG 18.58 (second) 77.8 54.8 0.687 0.326
Age 55 (years) 67.6 50.0 0.627 0.184
Kim et al. [38] MFS 50 85.7 58.8 3.0 100.0 0.719
JHFRAT 14 67.8 80.2 7.0 99.9 0.728

PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; AUC, area under receiver operating characteristics curve; MFS, Morse Fall Scale; JHFRAT, Johns Hopkins Hospital Fall Risk Assessment Tool; BMFRA, Bobath Memorial Hospital Fall Risk Assessment Scale; HFRM II, Hendrich II Fall Risk Model; STRATIFY, St. Thomas’s Risk Assessment Tool in Falling Elderly Inpatients; FAS-K, Fall Assessment Scale-Korean version; TUG, Timed Up and Go test.

Phys. Ther. Korea 2023;30:1~7 https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2023.30.1.1
© Physical Therapy Korea