Phys Ther Korea 2017; 24(2): 37-47
Published online May 1, 2017
https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2017.24.2.037
© Korean Research Society of Physical Therapy
이형렬1, 심재훈2, 오덕원3
Hyoung-ryeol Lee1, Jae-hun Shim2, and Duck-won Oh3
1Dept. of Physical Therapy, Saehaneul Orthopedic Surgery Clinic,
2Dept. of Physical Therapy, Division of Health Science Baekseok University,
3Dept. of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science, Cheongju University
Correspondence to: Corresponding author: Jae-hun Shim
Active trigger points (TrPs) of the suboccipital muscles greatly contribute to the occurrence of chronic tension-type headache, with increased sensitivity of TrPs and facilitated referred pain. This study aimed to investigate whether the integration of high-frequency diathermy into suboccipital release is more beneficial than the use of suboccipital release alone. Thirty subjects were assigned to either experimental group-1 (EG-1) to undergo suboccipital release combined with high-frequency diathermy (frequency: 0.3 MHz, and electrode type: resistive electronic transfer), or EG-2 to undergo suboccipital release alone, or the control group (CG) with no intervention, with 10 subjects in each group. The assessment tools included the headache impact test 6 (HIT-6), perceived level of tenderness, neck disability index, and neck mobility. Intervention was performed for 10 minutes, twice per week, for 4 weeks, and measurements were performed before and after the interventions. The between-group comparison of the post-test values and changes between pretest and post-test showed significant differences for all parameters at p<.05, except for the left-to-right lateral bending range. In the post hoc test, EG-1 showed significant differences for the parameters in comparison with the CG, while no significant differences in the perceived tenderness level, on both temporal regions, were found between EG-2 and CG. Furthermore, the HIT-6 score and perceived tenderness level, in the right temporal region, showed significant differences between EG-1 and EG-2. In the within-group comparison, EG-1 and EG-2 appeared to be significantly different between pretest and post-test (p<.05), except for the perceived tenderness level in the right temporal region, with significance for the EG-1 group only (p<.05). These findings suggest that the suboccipital release technique may be advantageous to improve headache, tenderness, and neck function and mobility, with more favorable effects with the incorporation of high-frequency diathermy.Background:
Objects:
Methods:
Results:
Conclusion:
Keywords: High-frequency diathermy, Neck function, Suboccipital release, Tension-type headache.
Phys Ther Korea 2017; 24(2): 37-47
Published online May 1, 2017 https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2017.24.2.037
Copyright © Korean Research Society of Physical Therapy.
이형렬1, 심재훈2, 오덕원3
Hyoung-ryeol Lee1, Jae-hun Shim2, and Duck-won Oh3
1Dept. of Physical Therapy, Saehaneul Orthopedic Surgery Clinic,
2Dept. of Physical Therapy, Division of Health Science Baekseok University,
3Dept. of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science, Cheongju University
Correspondence to:Corresponding author: Jae-hun Shim
Active trigger points (TrPs) of the suboccipital muscles greatly contribute to the occurrence of chronic tension-type headache, with increased sensitivity of TrPs and facilitated referred pain. This study aimed to investigate whether the integration of high-frequency diathermy into suboccipital release is more beneficial than the use of suboccipital release alone. Thirty subjects were assigned to either experimental group-1 (EG-1) to undergo suboccipital release combined with high-frequency diathermy (frequency: 0.3 MHz, and electrode type: resistive electronic transfer), or EG-2 to undergo suboccipital release alone, or the control group (CG) with no intervention, with 10 subjects in each group. The assessment tools included the headache impact test 6 (HIT-6), perceived level of tenderness, neck disability index, and neck mobility. Intervention was performed for 10 minutes, twice per week, for 4 weeks, and measurements were performed before and after the interventions. The between-group comparison of the post-test values and changes between pretest and post-test showed significant differences for all parameters at p<.05, except for the left-to-right lateral bending range. In the post hoc test, EG-1 showed significant differences for the parameters in comparison with the CG, while no significant differences in the perceived tenderness level, on both temporal regions, were found between EG-2 and CG. Furthermore, the HIT-6 score and perceived tenderness level, in the right temporal region, showed significant differences between EG-1 and EG-2. In the within-group comparison, EG-1 and EG-2 appeared to be significantly different between pretest and post-test (p<.05), except for the perceived tenderness level in the right temporal region, with significance for the EG-1 group only (p<.05). These findings suggest that the suboccipital release technique may be advantageous to improve headache, tenderness, and neck function and mobility, with more favorable effects with the incorporation of high-frequency diathermy.Background:
Objects:
Methods:
Results:
Conclusion:
Keywords: High-frequency diathermy, Neck function, Suboccipital release, Tension-type headache.
Use of suboccipital release technique. (A) palpation of subocciptal region and application of sustained pressure, and (B) distaction of subocciptal region.
Equipment of high-frequency diathermy (radio frequence therapeutique).
Application of high- frequency diathermy during suboccipital release. Physical therapist weared the strap-typed electrode in the middle of forearm (circle) and return-pad plate was positioned under patients’ upper back (square in dot line).
Diagram of the study (EG-1: integration of high-frequency diathermy into suboccipital release technique, EG-2: suboccipital release technique alone, CG: control group, HIT-6: Head impact Test-6, NDI: Neck Disability Index).
Table 1 .. General characteristics of subjects (N=30).
EG-1a (n1=10) | EG-2b (n2=10) | CGc (n3=10) | F(p) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gender (male/female) | 3/7 | 2/8 | 1/9 | .5(.5) |
Age (year) | 34.7±7.8d | 32.20±6.1 | 28.80±2.9 | 2.4(.1) |
Height (cm2) | 165.7±5.2 | 164.6±8.0 | 167.50±6.2 | .5(.6) |
Weight (kg) | 64.6±9.1 | 65.6±13.8 | 60.0±9.1 | .7(.5) |
HIT-6e (scores) | 63.9±4.3 | 62.3±5.9 | 62.0±2.0 | .5(.6) |
aexperimental group-1: integration of high-frequency heat therapy into suboccipital release
bexperimental group-2: suboccipital release alone
ccontrol group
dmean±standard deviation
ehead impact test-6.
Table 2 .. Comparison of the outcome of tenderness in pre and post-test among three groups (Unit: lb/cm2).
EG-1a (n1=10) | EG-2b (n2=10) | CGc (n3=10) | F(p) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIT-6e | Pre-test | 63.90±4.30d | 62.30±5.94 | 62.00±2.00 | .54(.58) |
Post-test | 46.30±7.45† | 51.00±6.81† | 60.80±2.44 | 15.20(<.001) | |
Difff | 17.60±7.10†‡ | 11.30±5.10† | 1.20±3.04 | 23.93(<.001) | |
t(p) | 7.83(<.001) | 7.00(<.001) | 1.24(.25) | ||
Left temporal region | Pre-test | 4.85±1.48 | 5.02±1.47 | 5.70±1.98 | .74(.48) |
Post-test | 7.05±2.01 | 5.95±1.75 | 5.40±1.80 | 2.04(.15) | |
Diff | -2.20±2.12† | -.94±.92 | .30±.68 | 9.72(<.001) | |
t(p) | -3.71(.01) | -3.23(.01) | 1.40(.20) | ||
Right temporal region | Pre-test | 5.30±.93 | 5.35±2.09 | 5.85±2.51 | .24(.80) |
Post-test | 7.45±1.67† | 5.88±1.70 | 5.38±1.82 | 3.91(.03) | |
Diff | -2.15±1.30†‡ | -.53±1.26 | .47±1.18 | 11.26(<.001) | |
t(p) | -5.23(<.001) | -1.32(.22) | 1.26(.24) | ||
Left suboccipital region | Pre-test | 5.40±2.10 | 5.55±2.72 | 6.96±2.00 | 1.40(.26) |
Post-test | 9.65±2.02 | 9.40±2.93 | 6.80±2.28 | .31(.02) | |
Diff | -2.25±1.49† | -1.84±0.73† | .16±1.26 | 11.38(<.001) | |
t(p) | -4.75(<.001) | -7.93(<.001) | .40(.70) | ||
Right suboccipital region | Pre-test | 5.91±1.91 | 5.44±2.56 | 6.78±2.28 | .90(.41) |
Post-test | 9.72±2.08 | 9.25±3.05 | 6.84±2.37 | .30(.03) | |
Diff | -1.81±1.54† | -1.81±1.02† | -.06±1.62 | 5.04(.01) | |
t(p) | -3.71(<.001) | -5.57(<.001) | -.11(.91) |
aexperimental group-1: integration of high-frequency heat therapy into suboccipital release
bexperimental group-2: suboccipital release alone
ccontrol group
dmean±standard deviation
ehead impact test-6
fdifference between pre- and post-test
†significant difference in a comparison with the control group (p<.05)
‡significant difference in a comparison with the EG-2 group (p<.05).
Table 3 .. Comparison of the outcome of NDI (neck disability index) and neck mobility in pre and post-test among three groups (Unit: degree).
EG-1a (n1=10) | EG-2b (n2=10) | CGc (n3=10) | F(p) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDIe | Pre-test | 16.70±3.59d | 17.60±5.92 | 14.60±4.32 | 1.06(.35) |
Post-test | 8.50±4.08† | 11.20±4.15 | 13.70±4.00 | 4.05(.02) | |
Difff | 8.20±4.34† | 6.40±2.83† | .90±1.96 | 14.10(<.001) | |
t(p) | 5.97(<.001) | 7.13(<.001) | 1.44(.25) | ||
Flexion-extension range | Pre-test | 91.55±12.47 | 94.7±9.84 | 95.2±7.52 | .38(.68) |
Post-test | 112.35±10.08† | 112.8±9.08† | 96.1±10.96 | 8.90(<.001) | |
Diff | -20.80±8.44† | -18.1±6.08† | -.90±4.6 | 27.00(<.001) | |
t(p) | -7.79(<.001) | -9.41(<.001) | -.61(.55) | ||
Left-right rotation range | Pre-test | 112.90±15.36 | 112.00±18.57 | 116.2±13.48 | .19(.82) |
Post-test | 128.20±10.67† | 128.10±9.36† | 115.3±11.17 | 5.05(.01) | |
Diff | -15.30±9.85† | -16.10±14.73† | .90±6.64 | 7.70(<.001) | |
t(p) | -4.90(<.001) | -3.45(.01) | .42(.68) | ||
Left-right lateral bending range | Pre-test | 77.10±11.25 | 84.5±4.97 | 82.9±5.19 | 2.54(.09) |
Post-test | 83.40±7.57 | 87.7±5.29 | 84.2±7.59 | 1.09(.34) | |
Diff | -6.30±7.08 | -3.2±4.39 | -1.30±7.1 | 1.59(.22) | |
t(p) | -2.81(.02) | -2.30(.05) | -.57(.58) |
aexperimental group-1: integration of high-frequency heat therapy into suboccipital release
bexperimental group-2: suboccipital release alone
ccontrol group
dmean±standard deviation
eneck disability index
fdifference between pre- and post-test
†significant difference in a comparison with the control group (p<.05)