Search

BIO DESIGN

pISSN 1225-8962
eISSN 2287-982X

Article

Article

Original Article

Split Viewer

Phys. Ther. Korea 2021; 28(1): 59-64

Published online February 20, 2021

https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2021.28.1.59

© Korean Research Society of Physical Therapy

Comparison of the Isometric Hip Flexors Strength in Supine Position in Subjects With and Without Weak Isometric Core Strength

In-Cheol Jeon , PT, PhD

Department of Physical Therapy, College of Life and Health Science, Research Institute for Basic Sciences, Hoseo University, Asan, Korea

Correspondence to: In-Cheol Jeon
E-mail: jeon6984@hoseo.edu
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6549-6866

Received: January 11, 2021; Revised: January 14, 2021; Accepted: January 14, 2021

Abstract

Background: Hip flexor muscles are very important in the hip joint structure as a mover and stabilizer. In addition, isometric hip flexor strength in the supine position needs to be considered with isometric core strength (WICS) to measure a precise strength in a clinical way.
Objects: We compared isometric hip flexor strength in the supine position in subjects with and without WICS (between factors) and conditions with and without an external support (within factors).
Methods: A total of 34 subjects (16 with WICS, 18 without WICS) participated in this study. We used the double-bent leg-lowering test to divide the subjects in two groups according to the presence of WICS. Isometric hip flexor strength was evaluated in the supine position both with and without an external support condition. The two-way mixed analysis of variance was applied to identify significant differences between groups (with vs. without WICS: between factors) and conditions (with vs. without an external support: within factors). Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05.
Results: In subjects with WICS, isometric hip flexor strength was greater with an external support than without it (p = 0.0064). In subjects without WICS, there were no significant differences in isometric hip flexor strength in the presence or absence of an external support (p = 0.075). The isometric hip flexor strength was significantly greater with an external support condition in particular in subjects with WICS.
Conclusion: The findings of this study reported that an external support condition in individuals with WICS may contribute to the improvement of isometric hip flexion strength in the supine position. Therefore, isometric core strength should be evaluated to distinguish the weakness between core region and hip flexors.

Keywords: Isometric core strength, Isometric hip flexors strength, Supine position

Article

Original Article

Phys. Ther. Korea 2021; 28(1): 59-64

Published online February 20, 2021 https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2021.28.1.59

Copyright © Korean Research Society of Physical Therapy.

Comparison of the Isometric Hip Flexors Strength in Supine Position in Subjects With and Without Weak Isometric Core Strength

In-Cheol Jeon , PT, PhD

Department of Physical Therapy, College of Life and Health Science, Research Institute for Basic Sciences, Hoseo University, Asan, Korea

Correspondence to:In-Cheol Jeon
E-mail: jeon6984@hoseo.edu
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6549-6866

Received: January 11, 2021; Revised: January 14, 2021; Accepted: January 14, 2021

Abstract

Background: Hip flexor muscles are very important in the hip joint structure as a mover and stabilizer. In addition, isometric hip flexor strength in the supine position needs to be considered with isometric core strength (WICS) to measure a precise strength in a clinical way.
Objects: We compared isometric hip flexor strength in the supine position in subjects with and without WICS (between factors) and conditions with and without an external support (within factors).
Methods: A total of 34 subjects (16 with WICS, 18 without WICS) participated in this study. We used the double-bent leg-lowering test to divide the subjects in two groups according to the presence of WICS. Isometric hip flexor strength was evaluated in the supine position both with and without an external support condition. The two-way mixed analysis of variance was applied to identify significant differences between groups (with vs. without WICS: between factors) and conditions (with vs. without an external support: within factors). Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05.
Results: In subjects with WICS, isometric hip flexor strength was greater with an external support than without it (p = 0.0064). In subjects without WICS, there were no significant differences in isometric hip flexor strength in the presence or absence of an external support (p = 0.075). The isometric hip flexor strength was significantly greater with an external support condition in particular in subjects with WICS.
Conclusion: The findings of this study reported that an external support condition in individuals with WICS may contribute to the improvement of isometric hip flexion strength in the supine position. Therefore, isometric core strength should be evaluated to distinguish the weakness between core region and hip flexors.

Keywords: Isometric core strength, Isometric hip flexors strength, Supine position

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Comparison of the difference in hip flexor muscle strength between groups with and without weak isometric core strength and conditions with and without an external support. The error bar represents the difference of hip flexor strength according to external support. *padjust < 0.01.
Physical Therapy Korea 2021; 28: 59-64https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2021.28.1.59

Table 1 . General characteristics of the subjects (N = 34).

VariableWith WICS (n = 16)Without WICS (n = 18)p-value
Age (y)43.6 ± 17.144.2 ± 15.6> 0.05
Height (cm)173.2 ± 8.4175.2 ± 9.3> 0.05
Weight (kg)70.4 ± 6.972.6 ± 7.8> 0.05

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation. WICS, weak isometric core strength.


Table 2 . The hip flexor strength in the group with and without WICS.

VariableWithoutexternal support (kg)Withexternal support (kg)Changing values ofstrength (kg)t valuep-valueEffect size
With WICS25.16 ± 6.13(23.13–28.60)29.89 ± 7.48(26.38–32.78)4.73 ± 1.35–5.5810.0064*0.87
Without WICS26.42 ± 7.05(24.37–28.12)26.92 ± 6.82(23.10–28.64)0.5 ± 0.23–1.9270.0750.16

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (95% confidence interval). WICS, weak isometric core strength. *padjust < 0.01.