Search

BIO DESIGN

pISSN 1225-8962
eISSN 2287-982X

Article

Article

Original Article

Split Viewer

Phys. Ther. Korea 2024; 31(3): 191-197

Published online December 20, 2024

https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2024.31.3.191

© Korean Research Society of Physical Therapy

Effect of Instrumented Hospital Bed on Physical Loads at a Disc Between L5 and S1 Vertebrae During Patient Repositioning

Seyoung Lee , PT, Kitaek Lim , PT, PhD, Jongwon Choi , PT, MSc, Junwoo Park , PT, MSc, Woochol Joseph Choi , PT, PhD

Injury Prevention and Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea

Correspondence to: Woochol Joseph Choi
E-mail: wcjchoi@yonsei.ac.kr
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6623-3806

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background: Lower back pain/injuries are common in caregivers, and physical stresses at the lower back during patient care are considered a primary cause. An instrumented hospital bed my help reduce the physical loads during patient repositioning.
Objects: We estimated the physical stresses at the lower back during patient repositioning to assess biomechanical benefits of the instrumented hospital bed.
Methods: Fourteen individuals repositioned a patient lying on an instrumented hospital bed. Trials were acquired for three types of repositioning (boosting superiorly, pulling laterally, and rolling from supine to side-lying). Trials were also acquired with two bed heights (10 and 30 cm below the anterior superior iliac spine), and with and without the bed tilting feature. During trials, kinematics of an upper body and hand pulling forces were recorded to determine the compressive and shear forces using static equilibrium equations. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to test if the peak compressive and shear forces were associated with repositioning type (3 levels), bed height (2 levels), and bed feature (2 levels).
Results: The peak compressive force ranged from 836 N to 3,954 N, and was associated with type (F = 14.661, p < 0.0005) and height (F = 10.044, p = 0.007), but not with bed feature (F = 0.003, p = 0.955). The peak shear force ranged from 66 to 473 N, and was associated with type (F = 8.021, p < 0.005), height (F = 6.548, p = 0.024), and bed feature (F = 22.978, p < 0.0005).
Conclusion: The peak compressive force at the lower back during patient repositioning, draws one’s attention as it is, in some trials, close to or greater than the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health safety criterion (3,400 N). Furthermore, the physical stress decreases by adjusting bed height, but not by using tilting feature of an instrumented bed.

Keywords: Caregivers, Hospital bed, Lower back pain, Patient repositioning, Physical stress

Article

Original Article

Phys. Ther. Korea 2024; 31(3): 191-197

Published online December 20, 2024 https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2024.31.3.191

Copyright © Korean Research Society of Physical Therapy.

Effect of Instrumented Hospital Bed on Physical Loads at a Disc Between L5 and S1 Vertebrae During Patient Repositioning

Seyoung Lee , PT, Kitaek Lim , PT, PhD, Jongwon Choi , PT, MSc, Junwoo Park , PT, MSc, Woochol Joseph Choi , PT, PhD

Injury Prevention and Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea

Correspondence to:Woochol Joseph Choi
E-mail: wcjchoi@yonsei.ac.kr
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6623-3806

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background: Lower back pain/injuries are common in caregivers, and physical stresses at the lower back during patient care are considered a primary cause. An instrumented hospital bed my help reduce the physical loads during patient repositioning.
Objects: We estimated the physical stresses at the lower back during patient repositioning to assess biomechanical benefits of the instrumented hospital bed.
Methods: Fourteen individuals repositioned a patient lying on an instrumented hospital bed. Trials were acquired for three types of repositioning (boosting superiorly, pulling laterally, and rolling from supine to side-lying). Trials were also acquired with two bed heights (10 and 30 cm below the anterior superior iliac spine), and with and without the bed tilting feature. During trials, kinematics of an upper body and hand pulling forces were recorded to determine the compressive and shear forces using static equilibrium equations. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to test if the peak compressive and shear forces were associated with repositioning type (3 levels), bed height (2 levels), and bed feature (2 levels).
Results: The peak compressive force ranged from 836 N to 3,954 N, and was associated with type (F = 14.661, p < 0.0005) and height (F = 10.044, p = 0.007), but not with bed feature (F = 0.003, p = 0.955). The peak shear force ranged from 66 to 473 N, and was associated with type (F = 8.021, p < 0.005), height (F = 6.548, p = 0.024), and bed feature (F = 22.978, p < 0.0005).
Conclusion: The peak compressive force at the lower back during patient repositioning, draws one’s attention as it is, in some trials, close to or greater than the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health safety criterion (3,400 N). Furthermore, the physical stress decreases by adjusting bed height, but not by using tilting feature of an instrumented bed.

Keywords: Caregivers, Hospital bed, Lower back pain, Patient repositioning, Physical stress

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Patient repositioning. (A) Instrumented hospital bed used in this study. (B) Participants moved a patient up in bed (“boosting superiorly”), (C) pulled toward to the participant, and (D) rolled from supine to side-lying.
Physical Therapy Korea 2024; 31: 191-197https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2024.31.3.191

Fig 2.

Figure 2.A simple kinematic model of an upper body. Static equilibrium equations were used to determine compressive and shear forces at a disc between L5 and S1 vertebrae. Fm, muscle force; Fc, compressive force; Fs, shear force; Wb, participant’s upper body weight; Fp, hand pulling force.
Physical Therapy Korea 2024; 31: 191-197https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2024.31.3.191

Fig 3.

Figure 3.Effects on the peak compressive force during patient repositioning. The peak compressive force was influenced by repositioning type and bed height, but not by bed feature. *p < 0.05.
Physical Therapy Korea 2024; 31: 191-197https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2024.31.3.191

Fig 4.

Figure 4.Effects on the peak shear force during patient repositioning. The peak shear force was affected by bed feature, repositioning type and bed height. *p < 0.05.
Physical Therapy Korea 2024; 31: 191-197https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2024.31.3.191

Table 1 . Average values of outcome variables with standard deviation shown in parenthesis.

Repositioning typeBoosting superiorlyPulling laterallyRolling from supine to side-lying




Bed heightLowHighLowHighLowHigh







InclinationTiltLevelTiltLevelTiltLevelTiltLevelTiltLevelTiltLevel
Peak compressive
force (N)
2,067 (506)2,031 (393)2,054 (440)2,010 (361)1,573 (353)1,654 (329)1,403 (243)1,440 (221)1,848 (463)1,935 (422)1,689 (374)1,736 (434)
Peak shear force
(N)
166 (69)179 (66)129 (33)128 (41)223 (76)246 (85)223 (74)259 (79)171 (66)246 (85)145 (46)259 (79)